|
Randomized Clinical Trial of Burch vs Sling Procedures for Women with Stress Urinary Incontinence Clinical Trials Data presented on Clinical Trials Search is not meant to be a substitute for qualified medical advice, visits or professional assistance with a genuine dr.. We are not doctors. Always consult your mD about Randomized Clinical Trial of Burch vs Sling Procedures for Women with Stress Urinary Incontinence conditions. Clinical Trials Search.org is a site devoted to listing clinical research studies in human subjects. Randomized Clinical Trial of Burch vs Sling Procedures for Women with Stress Urinary Incontinence Clinical research trials and Randomized Clinical Trial of Burch vs Sling Procedures for Women with Stress Urinary Incontinence medical trials take place in many of places throughout the U.S.A.. A clinical trial or clinical study is a research project with human volunteer subjects. Clinical drug trials and pharmaceutical clinical trials usually evaluate the effectiveness of new does drugs. The purpose of the studies / projects is to solve specific human healthcare questions. Clinical trials are a popular way for mDs, government agencies, and private sector companies to find cures for all varieties of conditions, like Randomized Clinical Trial of Burch vs Sling Procedures for Women with Stress Urinary Incontinence. Randomized Clinical Trial of Burch vs Sling Procedures for Women with Stress Urinary Incontinence Clinical Trials and other clinical trials allow for volunteers to have health treatment options before they are available to the masses. Many times the human subjects acquire professional assistance for free of charge, and sometimes they are compensated for their time. Occasionally there is a cost for a Randomized Clinical Trial of Burch vs Sling Procedures for Women with Stress Urinary Incontinence clinical trial. Test subjects typically obtain the finest healthcare available for their Randomized Clinical Trial of Burch vs Sling Procedures for Women with Stress Urinary Incontinence condition. Dangers are a reality, nevertheless, and might include additional or frequent doctor trips, medical dangers (possibly life-jeopardising), and/or the treatment being ineffectual. Trials are federally regulated with strict guidelines to protect clinical trials patients.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home > "R" Clinical Trials Conditions > Randomized Clinical Trial of Burch vs Sling Procedures for Women with Stress Urinary Incontinence  Randomized Clinical Trial of Burch vs Sling Procedures for Women with Stress Urinary Incontinence
Randomized Clinical Trial of Burch vs Sling Procedures for Women with Stress Urinary Incontinence
For Condition: Urinary Incontinence
Status: Recruiting
Sponsor(s): National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) , University of Alabama, Birmingham,University of California, San Diego,University of Maryland,University of Pittsburgh,University of Texas,University of Utah,Beaumont Hospital,Loyola University,New England Research Institutes
Synopsis: The primary aim of this clinical trial is to compare the treatment success for two surgical procedures that are frequently used and have similar cure rates, yet have not been compared directly to each other in a large, rigorously conducted randomized trial. The secondary aims of the trial are to compare other outcomes for the two surgical procedures, including quality of life, sexual function, satisfaction with treatment outcomes, complications, and need for other treatment(s)after surgery. Follow-up will be a minimum of two years and up to four years.
Details:
Eligibility:
Study Type: Interventional, Treatment, Randomized, Open Label, Active Control, Single Group Assignment, Efficacy Study
Minimum Age/Maximum Age: 21 Years/
Genders: Female
Protocol Entry Criteria: - Predominant stress urinary incontinence by self-report,examination and test; - Urethral hypermobility; - Eligible for both surgical procedures; - Ambulatory; - Not pregnant; - >12 months post-partum; - No systemic disease known to affect bladder function; - No current chemotherapy or radiation therapy; - No urethral diverticulum, augmentation cytoplasty, or artificial sphincter; - No recent pelvic surgery; - Available for follow-up and able to complete study assessments; - Signed informed consent.
Total Enrollment: 650
Location and Contact Information:
Overall Study Official:
WilliamSteers, Study Chair, University of Virginia
University of Maryland *Recruiting*
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201
United States
Recruiting Toby Chai 410-328-5544
University of California *Recruiting*
San Diego, California, 92037
United States
Recruiting Michael Albo 619-543-3356
University of Texas, Southwestern *Recruiting*
Dallas, Texas, 75390-9110
United States
Recruiting Philippe Zimmern 214-648-7190
University of Alabama *Recruiting*
Birmingham, Alabama, 35249-7333
United States
Recruiting Holly Richter 205-934-7874
Beaumont Hospital *Recruiting*
Royal Oak, Michigan,
United States
Recruiting Ananias Diokno 248-551-0387
University of Pittsburgh *Recruiting*
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213
United States
Recruiting Halina Zyczynski 412-641-1440
University of Texas Health Sciences Center *Recruiting*
San Antonio, Texas, 78229-3900
United States
Recruiting R. Cespedes 210-292-5755
University of Utah *Recruiting*
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84132
United States
Recruiting Peggy Norton 801-581-3565
Loyola University Medical Center *Recruiting*
Maywood, Illinois, 60153
United States
Recruiting Linda Brubaker 708-216-2170
Additional Information:
Study ID Numbers: UITN-RCT;
Study Start Date: February 2002
Record last reviewed: January 2004
Additional information available at: clinicaltrials.gov
Clinicaltrials.gov Reference link: NCT00064662
Other Urinary Incontinence Studies:
1. A Case Finding and Referral System for Older Veterans within Primary Care
2. Prevent Inability To Control Urination
3. An Implantable Microstimulator for the Chronic Treatment of Refractory Urinary Urge Incontinence
4. ORWH:SCOR on Sex and Gender Factors Affecting Women's Incontinence
5. Randomized Clinical Trial of Burch vs Sling Procedures for Women with Stress Urinary Incontinence
Related Studies:
Other Urinary Incontinence Clinical Trials
Other California Clinical Trials
Other San Diego Clinical Trials
Randomized Clinical Trial of Burch vs Sling Procedures for Women with Stress Urinary Incontinence
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
