|
Effects of Brain Stimulation on Learning and Reasoning Clinical Trials Info presented on Clinical Trials Search isn't intended to be a substitute for qualified medical advice, visits or professional assistance by using a real mD. We are not docs. Always confer with your physician about Effects of Brain Stimulation on Learning and Reasoning conditions. Clinical Trials Search.org is a website committed to listing clinical research studies in human subjects. Effects of Brain Stimulation on Learning and Reasoning Clinical research trials and Effects of Brain Stimulation on Learning and Reasoning health trials occur in many of cities throughout the US. A clinical trial or clinical study is a research project with human volunteer subjects. Clinical drug trials and pharmaceutical clinical trials generally evaluate the effectivity of new does drugs. The intent of the studies / undertakings is to resolve particular human health questions. Clinical trials are a popular way for physicians, government agencies, and private sector companies to detect remedies for all sorts of conditions, including Effects of Brain Stimulation on Learning and Reasoning. Effects of Brain Stimulation on Learning and Reasoning Clinical Trials and other clinical trials permit volunteers to obtain healthcare treatment alternatives before they are available to the masses. Most times the participants undergo professional assistance for without cost, and occasionally they are compensated for their time. Occasionally there is a cost for a Effects of Brain Stimulation on Learning and Reasoning clinical trial. Test subjects typically receive the most expert healthcare available for their Effects of Brain Stimulation on Learning and Reasoning condition. Dangers are a reality, however, and may include more or frequent mD visits, healthcare dangers (perhaps life-endangering), and/or the treatment being ineffectual. Trials are federally regulated with rigid guidelines to protect clinical trials patients.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home > "E" Clinical Trials Conditions > Effects of Brain Stimulation on Learning and Reasoning  Effects of Brain Stimulation on Learning and Reasoning
Effects of Brain Stimulation on Learning and Reasoning
For Condition: Cerebellar Disease,Dementia,Healthy,Parkinson's Disease
Status: Completed
Sponsor(s): National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) ,
Synopsis: Imaging studies of the brain have revealed the different areas involved in the processes of learning and reasoning. However, the specific role these regions play in these processes, or if stimulating these areas can improve these processes is unknown. Researchers would like to use repetitive transcranial stimulation (rTMS) to better understand the roles of individual brain regions on the processes of learning and reasoning. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) involves the placement of a cooled electromagnet with a figure-eight coil on the patient's scalp, and rapidly turning on and off the magnetic flux. This permits non-invasive, relatively localized stimulation of the surface of the brain (cerebral cortex). The effect of magnetic stimulation varies, depending upon the location, intensity and frequency of the magnetic pulses. The purpose of this study is to use rTMS to help determine the roles of different brain regions in the development of implicit learning of motor sequences and analogic reasoning. In addition, researchers hope to evaluate if stimulation of these regions speeds up the process of learning or analogic reasoning.
Details: The human frontal cortex subserves a number of psychological processes including those necessary for adequate implicit learning of visuomotor sequences and analogical reasoning. 1. Implicit learning is a form of procedural learning indicated by behavioral improvement without awareness of a repeated stimulus structure that leads to improved performance. This type of learning has been associated with activation of the primary motor cortex (M1) in neuroimaging studies. While neuroimaging studies contributed to identify this region, they do not provide information about its relative role in the process of implicit learning. Is activity in this region necessary for implicit learning to occur? Is it possible that "energizing" this region using subthreshold transcranial magnetic stimulation can accelerate the implicit phase of learning? The purpose of this protocol is to transiently stimulate focally M1 and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during acquisition of implicit learning and evaluate the effects on reaction times and accuracy of performance. We plan to study a group of normal volunteers, and three groups of patients who demonstrate impaired visuomotor procedural learning tasks: those with Parkinson's disease, cerebellar disease, and focal frontal lesions. The result expected from this study is an advanced understanding of the role that the motor cortex and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex plays in implicit learning in health and disease. Additionally, we expect to be able to shorten the implicit phase of learning by rTMS particularly in the patient groups that exhibit abnormal procedural learning. 2. Analogical reasoning requires that subjects adequately process different forms of information and then perform a mapping process that allows them to recognize the similarity between two or more forms of information. Evidence has been provided that indicates this process of analogical mapping is subserved by the frontal cortex. We plan to study a group of normal volunteers, and three groups of patients who demonstrate impaired performance on tests of analogical reasoning and problem-solving: those with Parkinson's disease, frontal lobe dementia, and focal frontal lesions. We predict that subthreshold rTMS will facilitate analogical reasoning by promoting the activation of established or novel neural activation patterns that represents the actual mapping and decision processes required for analogical reasoning. Additionally, we expect to facilitate response times and accuracy in analogical mapping in those patients that exhibit abnormal analogical reasoning performance.
Eligibility:
Study Type: Observational, Natural History
Minimum Age/Maximum Age: /
Genders: Both
Protocol Entry Criteria: INCLUSION CRITERIA Right handed normal volunteers (18-65 years old). Patients with Parkinson's disease off medication. Patients with cerebellar deficits. Patients with frontal lobe lesions. Patients with frontal lobe dementia. EXCLUSION CRITERIA Subjects with personal or family history of seizures or other neurological disorders. Pregnant women. Volunteers or patients with severe coronary artery disease. Metal in the cranium except mouth. Intracardiac lines. Increased intracranial pressure as evaluated by clinical means. Cardiac pacemakers. Intake of neuroleptics.
Total Enrollment: 122
Location and Contact Information:
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
Bethesda, Maryland, 20892
United States
Additional Information:
Study ID Numbers: 980025; 98-N-0025
Study Start Date: October 30, 1997
Record last reviewed: December 2, 2003
Additional information available at: clinicaltrials.gov
Clinicaltrials.gov Reference link: NCT00001776
Other Healthy Studies:
1. Effects of Brain Stimulation on Learning and Reasoning
Related Studies:
Other Healthy Clinical Trials
Other Maryland Clinical Trials
Other Bethesda Clinical Trials
Effects of Brain Stimulation on Learning and Reasoning
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
