|
Comparative Trial of Pivanex and Docetaxel vs Docetaxel Monotherapy in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Clinical Trials Facts presented on Clinical Trials Search isn't designed to be a substitute for proven healthcare advice, calls or treatment by using a genuine medical doctor. We aren't mDs. Always confer with your doctor on Comparative Trial of Pivanex and Docetaxel vs Docetaxel Monotherapy in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer conditions. Clinical Trials Search.org is a website devoted to listing clinical research studies in human subjects. Comparative Trial of Pivanex and Docetaxel vs Docetaxel Monotherapy in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Clinical research trials and Comparative Trial of Pivanex and Docetaxel vs Docetaxel Monotherapy in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer healthcare trials occur in a lot of of places across the United States. A clinical trial or clinical study is a research project with human volunteer subjects. Clinical drug trials and pharmaceutical clinical trials generally assess the effectivity of new does drugs. The role of the studies / undertakings is to solve specific human healthcare questions. Clinical trials are a popular way for doctors, government agencies, and private sector companies to find treatments for all kinds of conditions, including Comparative Trial of Pivanex and Docetaxel vs Docetaxel Monotherapy in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Comparative Trial of Pivanex and Docetaxel vs Docetaxel Monotherapy in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Clinical Trials and other clinical trials allow for volunteers to access health treatment choices before they are available to the general public. Many times the test subjects get treatment for without cost, and sometimes they are compensated for their time. Occasionally there is a cost for a Comparative Trial of Pivanex and Docetaxel vs Docetaxel Monotherapy in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer clinical trial. Test subjects typically receive the most effective healthcare possible for their Comparative Trial of Pivanex and Docetaxel vs Docetaxel Monotherapy in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer condition. Risks are a reality, nonetheless, and could include extra or frequent dr. calls, health hazards (perhaps life-jeopardizing), and/or the treatment being ineffective. Trials are federally regulated with rigid guidelines to protect clinical trials subjects.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home > "C" Clinical Trials Conditions > Comparative Trial of Pivanex and Docetaxel vs Docetaxel Monotherapy in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer  Comparative Trial of Pivanex and Docetaxel vs Docetaxel Monotherapy in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Comparative Trial of Pivanex and Docetaxel vs Docetaxel Monotherapy in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
For Condition: Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
Status: No longer recruiting
Sponsor(s): Titan Pharmaceuticals ,
Synopsis: This randomized study will assess the efficacy and safety of the combination of Pivanex and docetaxel compared to docetaxel alone in patients with a type of lung cancer called non-small cell lung cancer. Pivanex is an investigational agent, and docetaxel is an approved drug.
Details: Rationale: Pivanex is a histone deacetylase inhibitor that induces tumor differentiation and/or apoptosis. Pivanex has been well tolerated in clinical trials and has shown preliminary evidence of efficacy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Docetaxel is an approved drug for second-line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Preclinical studies indicate that the combination of Pivanex and docetaxel is synergistic. Purpose: This open-label randomized trial will evaluate whether combination therapy with Pivanex and docetaxel provides clinical benefit over docetaxel alone in patients with chemotherapy resistant non-small cell lung cancer. Objectives: • Compare the survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with combination therapy with Pivanex and docetaxel vs. docetaxel alone • Compare the time to disease progression, tumor responses, and safety profile of patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with combination therapy with Pivanex and docetaxel vs. docetaxel alone Outline: This is a randomized, open-label, multicenter study in patients with non-small cell lung cancer who have previously been treated with no more than one prior platinum containing chemotherapy regimen. Patients are stratified by ECOG performance status (0-1 vs. 2), response to prior platinum based chemotherapy (progression vs. CR/PR/SD) and prior taxane therapy (yes vs. no). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. • Arm A: Patients receive the combination of Pivanex intravenously on Days 1-3 and docetaxel intravenously on Day 4. Treatment repeats every 21 days until disease progression or treatment withdrawal. • Arm B: Patients receive docetaxel intravenously on Day 1. Treatment repeats every 21 days until disease progression or treatment withdrawal.
Eligibility:
Study Type: Interventional, Treatment, Randomized, Open Label, Active Control, Parallel Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study
Minimum Age/Maximum Age: 18 Years/
Genders: Both
Protocol Entry Criteria: Inclusion Criteria: - Histologically or cytologically confirmed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); Treatment with one prior platinum-based chemotherapy regimen (Eligible patients may include: a) Patients previously treated with adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (must be completed within 6 months prior to randomization) or b) Patients who have received chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic lung cancer); - Recurrent or progressive NSCLC (local, distant, or both) following initial chemotherapy); - Measurable or non-measurable disease; - Males and females, age => 18 years; - Adequate renal function with creatinine => 1.5 mg/dl; - Adequate liver function with alkaline phosphatase => 2.5 X upper limit of normal, SGOT, and SGPT => 1.5 X upper limit of normal; and total bilirubin => upper limit of normal; - Adequate bone marrow function: platelets > 100,000/mm3, hemoglobin => 9 g/dL, and absolute neutrophil count (ANC) => 1,500 cells/mm3; - Able to give informed consent; - Discontinuation of previous surgery, radiation therapy or cancer chemotherapy at least four weeks prior to randomization (six weeks if a prior nitrosourea or mitomycin C), with recovery from treatment-associated toxicity; - A predicted life expectancy of at least 12 weeks; and - ECOG performance status of 0, 1, or 2. Exclusion Criteria: - Receipt of more than one chemotherapy regimen for NSCLC; - A second malignancy within the last 5 years other than curatively treated carcinoma-in-situ or non-melanoma skin cancer; - Pregnant or lactating females (Females of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test and all male and female patients of reproductive potential must agree to use adequate birth control); - Known HIV-positive patients; - Acute medical problems, such as ischemic heart or lung disease or uncontrolled systemic infection; - Patients with any underlying medical conditions or circumstance, which would contraindicate therapy with study treatment, affect compliance or impair evaluation of study endpoints; - Patients receiving investigational agents within 30 days of the screening visit; - Known allergy to reagents in the study; - Prior docetaxel therapy; - Symptomatic or untreated brain metastases (Patients with brain metastases are eligible if they are clinically and neurologically stable for > 4 weeks since therapy (radiation therapy, radiosurgery/gamma knife; surgical resection) as determined by the investigator and either off corticosteroids or on a stable dose of corticosteroids).
Total Enrollment: 225
Location and Contact Information:
Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute & Research Center
New Delhi, , 110 085
India
Montefiore Medical Center, Department of Oncology
Bronx, New York, 10467
United States
Gaston Hematology & Oncology Associates
Gastonia, North Carolina, 28054
United States
Wilshire Oncology Medical Group
La Verne, California, 91750
United States
Hematology and Oncology Specialists, LLC
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70115
United States
HemOnCare
Brooklyn, New York, 11235
United States
Regional Cancer Centre
Thiruvananthapuram, , 695 011
India
University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh Cancer Centre
Edinburgh, , EH4 2XU
United Kingdom
Additional Information:
Study ID Numbers: TTP-200-03-01; NSCLC Clincal Trial
Study Start Date: September 2003
Record last reviewed: May 2004
Additional information available at: clinicaltrials.gov
Clinicaltrials.gov Reference link: NCT00073385
Other Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung Studies:
1. Mistletoe Extract and Gemcitabine for the Treatment of Solid Tumor Cancers
2. This study is to compare the efficacy of ZD6474 and ZD1839 in subjects with NSCLC.
3. A multicenter phase 2 study of CI-1040 in patients with advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer, breast cancer, colon cancer, or pancreatic cancer
4. Safety and Effectiveness of ABT-510 Plus Combination Chemotherapy in Subjects with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
5. A Phase 3 Trial of LY900003 Plus Gemcitabine and Cisplatin versus Gemcitabine and Cisplatin in Patients with Advanced, Previously Untreated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Related Studies:
Other Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung Clinical Trials
Other Clinical Trials
Other Thiruvananthapuram Clinical Trials
Comparative Trial of Pivanex and Docetaxel vs Docetaxel Monotherapy in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
