Search Clinical Trials
By Condition
By Location (USA)
By Location (Other)
By Sponsor
Resources
Privacy Policy
About Us
Disclaimer
A Randomized Trial of the Efficacy and Safety of a Strategy of Starting with Nelfinavir Versus Ritonavir Added to Background Antiretroviral (AR) Nucleoside Therapy in HIV-Infected Individuals with CD4+ Cell Counts Less than or Equal to 200/mm3 Clinical Trials Info presented on Clinical Trials Search is not intended to be a substitute for certified medical advice, visits or professional assistance using a real physician. We are not physicians. Always consult your dr. about A Randomized Trial of the Efficacy and Safety of a Strategy of Starting with Nelfinavir Versus Ritonavir Added to Background Antiretroviral (AR) Nucleoside Therapy in HIV-Infected Individuals with CD4+ Cell Counts Less than or Equal to 200/mm3 conditions. Clinical Trials Search.org is a site dedicated to listing clinical research studies in human subjects. A Randomized Trial of the Efficacy and Safety of a Strategy of Starting with Nelfinavir Versus Ritonavir Added to Background Antiretroviral (AR) Nucleoside Therapy in HIV-Infected Individuals with CD4+ Cell Counts Less than or Equal to 200/mm3 Clinical research trials and A Randomized Trial of the Efficacy and Safety of a Strategy of Starting with Nelfinavir Versus Ritonavir Added to Background Antiretroviral (AR) Nucleoside Therapy in HIV-Infected Individuals with CD4+ Cell Counts Less than or Equal to 200/mm3 health trials happen in many of localities throughout the U.S.. A clinical trial or clinical study is a research project with human volunteer subjects. Clinical drug trials and pharmaceutical clinical trials typically measure the effectualness of new drugs. The function of the studies / projects is to resolve particular human medical questions. Clinical trials are a popular manner for mDs, government agencies, and private sector corporations to discover remedies for all varieties of circumstances, like A Randomized Trial of the Efficacy and Safety of a Strategy of Starting with Nelfinavir Versus Ritonavir Added to Background Antiretroviral (AR) Nucleoside Therapy in HIV-Infected Individuals with CD4+ Cell Counts Less than or Equal to 200/mm3. A Randomized Trial of the Efficacy and Safety of a Strategy of Starting with Nelfinavir Versus Ritonavir Added to Background Antiretroviral (AR) Nucleoside Therapy in HIV-Infected Individuals with CD4+ Cell Counts Less than or Equal to 200/mm3 Clinical Trials and other clinical trials allow volunteers to obtain healthcare treatment options before they are available to the masses. Some times the participants undergo professional assistance for free of charge, and occasionally they are paid for their time. Sometimes there is a cost for a A Randomized Trial of the Efficacy and Safety of a Strategy of Starting with Nelfinavir Versus Ritonavir Added to Background Antiretroviral (AR) Nucleoside Therapy in HIV-Infected Individuals with CD4+ Cell Counts Less than or Equal to 200/mm3 clinical trial. Human subjects often get the best healthcare available for their A Randomized Trial of the Efficacy and Safety of a Strategy of Starting with Nelfinavir Versus Ritonavir Added to Background Antiretroviral (AR) Nucleoside Therapy in HIV-Infected Individuals with CD4+ Cell Counts Less than or Equal to 200/mm3 condition. Dangers are a reality, however, and may include additional or frequent mD visits, healthcare dangers (potentially life-jeopardising), and/or the treatment being ineffectual. Trials are federally governed with rigorous guidelines to protect clinical trials patients.

Home > "A" Clinical Trials Conditions > A Randomized Trial of the Efficacy and Safety of a Strategy of Starting with Nelfinavir Versus Ritonavir Added to Background Antiretroviral (AR) Nucleoside Therapy in HIV-Infected Individuals with CD4+ Cell Counts Less than or Equal to 200/mm3

A Randomized Trial of the Efficacy and Safety of a Strategy of Starting with Nelfinavir Versus Ritonavir Added to Background Antiretroviral (AR) Nucleoside Therapy in HIV-Infected Individuals with CD4+ Cell Counts Less than or Equal to 200/mm3



A Randomized Trial of the Efficacy and Safety of a Strategy of Starting with Nelfinavir Versus Ritonavir Added to Background Antiretroviral (AR) Nucleoside Therapy in HIV-Infected Individuals with CD4+ Cell Counts Less than or Equal to 200/mm3

For Condition: HIV Infections
Status: No longer recruiting
Sponsor(s): National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) ,
Synopsis: To compare nelfinavir (NFV) with ritonavir (RTV) for delaying disease progression or death in HIV-infected patients with CD4+ cell counts less than 100 cells/mm3 [AS PER AMENDMENT 3/11/98: less than or equal to 200 cells/mm3]. To compare NFV with RTV for the development of adverse events and for rates of permanent discontinuation of study medication. [AS PER AMENDMENT 10/02/97: To compare by intention-to-treat analysis for disease progression, including death, the following two regimens: NFV plus background combination antiretroviral (AR) therapy followed by indinavir (IDV) or RTV in the event of significant intolerance; and RTV plus AR therapy followed by IDV, then NFV, in the event of significant intolerance.] [AS PER AMENDMENT 3/11/98: SUBSTUDY CPCRA 045: To determine the relative rates of emergence of HIV-1 resistance and to compare changes in plasma HIV RNA levels and CD4+ cell counts in a sample of patients with CD4+ cell counts <= 200/mm3 who are enrolled in protocol CPCRA 042.] AR therapy is rapidly becoming the standard of care for the treatment of HIV infection. AR therapy provides the best opportunity for maximizing viral suppression, reducing toxicity and delaying the emergence of resistant strains. The newest class of AR agents, the HIV protease inhibitors, exhibits the most potent anti-HIV effects described to date. This study will compare 2 protease inhibitors, NFV and RTV for efficacy and safety in a population with advanced HIV disease, who are taking various background nucleoside therapies.
Details: AR therapy is rapidly becoming the standard of care for the treatment of HIV infection. AR therapy provides the best opportunity for maximizing viral suppression, reducing toxicity and delaying the emergence of resistant strains. The newest class of AR agents, the HIV protease inhibitors, exhibits the most potent anti-HIV effects described to date. This study will compare 2 protease inhibitors, NFV and RTV for efficacy and safety in a population with advanced HIV disease, who are taking various background nucleoside therapies. Eligible patients will be randomized either to NFV plus background AR nucleoside therapy or to RTV plus background AR nucleoside therapy. Background AR therapy may also be no background therapy, although use of protease inhibitors as monotherapy is not recommended unless there is no alternative. Patients will be allowed to cross over to the alternate protease inhibitor if they reach a primary study endpoint. Data will be collected every 4 months. [AS PER AMENDMENT 10/2/97: Patients assigned to the NFV arm who develop a significant intolerance may switch to RTV or IDV; those assigned to the RTV arm who develop a significant intolerance are encouraged to switch to IDV (NFV allowed if IDV contraindicated). Switchover for intolerance is strongly discouraged during the first 4 weeks of follow-up. Patients initially assigned to NFV therapy who experience disease progression may switch to RTV; if RTV is not tolerated, patients may switch to IDV. Because of the cross-resistance between RTV and IDV, patients who progress on RTV should switch to NFV.] [AS PER AMENDMENT 12/15/98: Patients originally assigned to NFV who experience poor virologic control or disease progression should change to RTV or IDV or enroll in the PIP protocol (CPCRA 057). Conversely, patients originally assigned to RTV should change to NFV or enroll in the PIP protocol (such patients continue to be followed on this study). Because of cross-resistance between RTV and IDV, change from RTV to IDV is discouraged. Determination of poor virologic control or disease progression is at the discretion of the patient's clinician. Change in background antiretroviral therapy should occur at the same time that the protease inhibitor is changed for poor virologic control or progression; the choice of new background antiretroviral agents is at the discretion of the clinician.] Randomization is stratified by clinical site.] [AS PER AMENDMENT 3/11/98: SUBSTUDY CPCRA 045: At least 600 patients (>= 400 from CPCRA sites and >= 200 from CTN sites) will be enrolled in the substudy. These patients will have a plasma sample collected for HIV RNA and genotypic resistance within 30 days prior to randomization, at the 1-month visit, and at the q-4-month study visits thereafter until the end of the study. CD4+ cell counts will be done at the 1-month visit and at the q-4-month study visits until the end of the study. A subset of patients will also have immunophenotyping of CD4+ and CD8+ cell TCR V-beta clones carried out before and during treatment. Another subset of patients at selected sites will have viral cultures performed for phenotypic drug sensitivity testing. Initially, specimens for 50 randomly chosen patients in the group originally assigned RTV will be identified for resistance testing. Of this group, specimens for those who have received RTV/IDV for more than 1 month will be analyzed for genotypic resistance to obtain an estimate of the rate of resistance development and to estimate the risk of disease progression associated with resistance to RTV/ZDV. Based on these estimates, determination will be made of the total number of patients and specimens in both treatment groups in order to address the primary objective of comparing genotypic resistance in the two groups.]
Eligibility:
Study Type:
  Interventional, Treatment, Parallel Assignment, Safety Study
Minimum Age/Maximum Age: 13 Years/
Genders: Both
Protocol Entry Criteria: Inclusion Criteria Concurrent Medication: - Background AR nucleoside therapy is required, although background AR therapy may also be no background therapy. However, the use of protease inhibitors is not recommended as monotherapy unless there is no other alternative. Therefore, patients who are not on AR treatment may be enrolled at the discretion of the clinician. Allowed: - Saquinavir. Patients must have: - Documented HIV infection. - A CD4+ cell count <= 100/mm3 within 3 months prior to the study. [AS PER AMENDMENT 3/11/98: CD4+ cell count <= 200/mm3 any time prior to entry]. - Parental consent if patient is < 18 years old. Prior Medication: Allowed: - Saquinavir (SQV). Exclusion Criteria Co-existing Condition: Patients with the following symptoms or conditions are excluded: - Stage 2 or greater AIDS dementia complex. - [AS PER AMENDMENT 10/2/97: Any acute disease or condition that would, in the physician's judgement, contraindicate starting NFV or RTV.] - Known hypersensitivity to RTV or any of its ingredients (for patients assigned to RTV therapy). Concurrent Medication: Excluded: - Concomitant use of protease inhibitors. - Concomitant treatments that cannot be discontinued, and in the physician's judgement, should not be taken with NFV or RTV. AS PER AMENDMENT 10/2/97: - For patients randomized to NFV: - Concomitant therapy with terfenadine, astemizole, cisapride, triazolam, midazolam, ergot derivatives, amiodarone, quinidine, or rifampin. For patients randomized to IDV: - Concomitant therapy with terfenadine, astemizole, cisapride, triazolam, midazolam, and rifampin. Patients with any of the following prior symptoms are excluded: AS PER AMENDMENT 10/2/97: - History of clinically significant hypersensitivity reaction to any component of NFV tablets (for patients assigned to NFV therapy). Prior Medication: Excluded: - Prior use of protease inhibitors except SQV. [AS PER AMENDMENT 10/2/97: - Prior use of IDV for more than 4 weeks or other protease inhibitors (except SQV) for any prior duration.]
Total Enrollment: 1300

Location and Contact Information:

Overall Study Official:
PerezG,  Study Chair, 

Community Consortium / UCSF
San Francisco,  California,  94110
United States
 

Harlem AIDS Treatment Group
New York City,  New York,  10037
United States
 

AIDS Research Consortium of Atlanta
Atlanta,  Georgia,  30308
United States
 

Harlem AIDS Treatment Group / Harlem Hosp Ctr
New York City,  New York,  10037
United States
 

Community Consortium of San Francisco
San Francisco,  California,  94110
United States
 

Saint Joseph's Hosp
Philadelphia,  Pennsylvania,  19107
United States
 

Royal Univ Hosp
Saskatoon,  Saskatchewan, 
Canada
 

Wellesley Hosp
Toronto,  Ontario, 
Canada
 

Sunnybrook Health Science Centre
Toronto,  Ontario, 
Canada
 

North Jersey Community Research Initiative
Newark,  New Jersey,  071032842
United States
 

AIDS Research Alliance - Chicago
Chicago,  Illinois,  60657
United States
 

Philadelphia FIGHT
Philadelphia,  Pennsylvania,  19107
United States
 

Denver CPCRA / Denver Public Hlth
Denver,  Colorado,  802044507
United States
 

Timothy A Price
Washington D.C.,  District of Columbia,  204220001
United States
 

Henry Ford Hosp
Detroit,  Michigan,  48202
United States
 

Westat / NICHD
Rockville,  Maryland,  208503172
United States
 

Baltimore TRIALS
Baltimore,  Maryland,  21201
United States
 

Wayne State Univ / Univ Hlth Ctr
Detroit,  Michigan,  48201
United States
 

Saint Joseph's Hosp
London,  Ontario, 
Canada
 

Southern New Jersey AIDS Cln Trials / Dept of Med
Camden,  New Jersey,  08103
United States
 

The Research and Education Group
Portland,  Oregon,  97210
United States
 

Hotel - Dieu de Montreal
Montreal,  Quebec, 
Canada
 

Centre De Recherche En Infectiologie
Ste Foy,  Quebec, 
Canada
 

Denver Community Program for Clinical Research on AIDS
Denver,  Colorado,  80204
United States
 

Washington Reg AIDS Prog / Dept of Infect Dis
Washington D.C.,  District of Columbia,  20422
United States
 

SMBD-Jewish Gen Hosp
Montreal,  Quebec, 
Canada
 

Portland Veterans Adm Med Ctr / Rsch & Education Grp
Portland,  Oregon,  972109951
United States
 

Partners in Research - New Mexico
Albuquerque,  New Mexico,  87131
United States
 

Ottawa Gen Hosp
Ottawa,  Ontario, 
Canada
 

Toronto Gen Hosp
Toronto,  Ontario, 
Canada
 

QEII Health Science Centre
Halifax,  Nova Scotia, 
Canada
 

Saint Paul's Hosp
Vancouver,  British Columbia, 
Canada
 

Richmond AIDS Consortium
Richmond,  Virginia,  23298
United States
 

Mercer Area Early Intervention Services
Camden,  New Jersey,  081031438
United States
 

Montreal Chest Institute
Montreal,  Quebec, 
Canada
 

Veterans Administration Med Ctr / Regional AIDS Program
Washington D.C.,  District of Columbia,  20422
United States
 

New Jersey Community Research Initiative
Newark,  New Jersey,  07103
United States
 

Louisiana Comm AIDS Rsch Prog / Tulane Univ Med
New Orleans,  Louisiana,  70112
United States
 

Infectious Disease Physicians / Northern Virginia
Washington D.C.,  District of Columbia,  204220001
United States
 

Southern New Jersey AIDS Clinical Trials
Camden,  New Jersey,  08103
United States
 

Partners Research
Albuquerque,  New Mexico,  871315271
United States
 

Comprehensive AIDS Alliance of Detroit
Detroit,  Michigan,  48201
United States
 

Denver CPCRA / Denver Pub Hlth / Rocky Mt Cancer Ctr Aurora
Denver,  Colorado,  802044507
United States
 

Louisiana Community AIDS Research Program
New Orleans,  Louisiana,  70112
United States
 


Additional Information:
Study ID Numbers:
  CPCRA 042; 
Study Start Date: 
Record last reviewed: January 2004
Additional information available at: clinicaltrials.gov
Clinicaltrials.gov Reference link: NCT00000859

Other Hiv Infections Studies:
1. Active Immunization of HIV-1 Infected, Pregnant Women With CD4 Lymphocyte Counts >= 400/mm3: A Phase I Study of Safety and Immunogenicity of VaxSyn Recombinant gp160 (NOTE: Some Patients Receive Placebo)

2. Treatment of Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) Before Beginning Anti-HIV Drugs in Patients with Both HBV and HIV

3. Anti-HIV Drug Regimens With or Without Protease Inhibitors and Drug Level Monitoring in HIV Infected Adolescents

4. A Study to Evaluate the Impact of Stopping Treatment for the Prevention of Pneumonia in HIV-Positive Patients Receiving Anti-HIV Drugs Who Have Increased CD4 Cell Counts

5. A Phase II Double-Blind Study of Two Doses of SC-49483 in Combination With Zidovudine (ZDV) Versus ZDV

Related Studies:

Other HIV Infections Clinical Trials
Other District of Columbia Clinical Trials
Other Washington D.C. Clinical Trials

A Randomized Trial of the Efficacy and Safety of a Strategy of Starting with Nelfinavir Versus Ritonavir Added to Background Antiretroviral (AR) Nucleoside Therapy in HIV-Infected Individuals with CD4+ Cell Counts Less than or Equal to 200/mm3

Modify your Search

  Other HIV Infections Clinical Trials
  Other District of Columbia Clinical Trials
  Other Washington D.C. Clinical Trials


Warning: include(/var/www/cgi-bin/traxis/counter.php) [function.include]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/cts/domains/clinicaltrialssearch.org/public_html/index.php on line 103

Warning: include() [function.include]: Failed opening '/var/www/cgi-bin/traxis/counter.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/local/lib/php') in /home/cts/domains/clinicaltrialssearch.org/public_html/index.php on line 103